3 Reasons Why Those Dismissing Syria-Related Prophecies May Be Dead Wrong

Damascus 3

Click to read full story:  Bible Expert Joel Rosenberg Delivers 3 Reasons Why Those Dismissing Syria-Related Prophecies May Be Dead Wrong

  1. Damascus certainly has been attacked in the past, but has never ceased to be a city, something that Rosenberg believes is clearly prophesied in Isaiah 17.
  2. Isaiah didn’t receive the contents of Isaiah 17 until after 732 B.C. If this is true, it would mean that the Assyrian attack on Damascus was not what was being referenced in the text.
  3. Isaiah 17 Isn’t the Only Alleged Prophecy to Come.  While the Syrian conflict has shed light on the first three verses of that chapter, Rosenberg made it clear that Isaiah 11 through 24 is filled with “big picture” prophesies that he believes are set to take place in the future. These even include time-stamps, Rosenberg claims.

One thought on “3 Reasons Why Those Dismissing Syria-Related Prophecies May Be Dead Wrong

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s